C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\MLS\MultiLanguageTexts_fra.mls.C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\MLS\MultiLanguageTexts_eng.mls.C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\MLS\MultiLanguageTexts_deu.mls.C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\Help\LCC_Help_zho.rtf.C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\Help\LCC_Help_spa.rtf.C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\Help\LCC_Help_rus.rtf.C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\Help\LCC_Help_jpn.rtf.C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\Help\LCC_Help_ita.rtf. C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\Help\LCC_Help_fra.rtf.C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\Help\LCC_Help_eng.rtf.C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\Help\LCC_Help_deu.rtf.C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\eLCC.ini.C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\eLCC\eLCC.exe.The files below were left behind on your disk by eLicenser Control when you uninstall it: You should delete the folders below after you uninstall eLicenser Control: of eLicenser Control. You can find below info on other application versions of eLicenser Control:įollowing the uninstall process, the application leaves leftovers on the computer. The information on this page is only about version 6. Uninstall eLicenser Control.exe (5.72 MB).They take about 5.72 MB ( 5994960 bytes) on disk. The executable files below are installed together with eLicenser Control. Read more about how to uninstall it from your PC. It is produced by Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH. More information on Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH can be found here. Click on to get more details about eLicenser Control on Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH's website. Usually the eLicenser Control application is installed in the C:\Program Files (x86)/eLicenser directory, depending on the user's option during install. eLicenser Control's entire uninstall command line is C:\Program Files (x86)\eLicenser\Uninstaller\Uninstall eLicenser Control.exe. The application's main executable file is called Uninstall eLicenser Control.exe and its approximative size is 5.72 MB (5994960 bytes). The actual decision-making process is going to be fairly unique to each company and I can tell you that from my experience it really is vastly different between different companies though my previous IT and development based experience was outside of companies that created audio plugins.A guide to uninstall eLicenser Control from your computereLicenser Control is a Windows program. They'd also likely need that time to work on or implement whatever replacement licensing and copy protection scheme they subsequently chose. From my personal perspective, not IK's, I'd say a company would likely keep dongle protection around for the duration of the contract period for which they paid eLicenser, iLok, etc as a minimum even if they wanted to transition away from using a hardware dongle. However, there are likely challenges both internally and externally if a company considers not using a dongle. Honestly it was before my tenure with IK (so over 10 years ago, wow how time flies!) so I wasn't around to witness it. I'm just wondering from the point of view that if a company wanted to stop using a dongle copy protection scheme, is most of the effort in changing the code (and subsequently getting a new scheme in place), or getting the decision approved? This might be a question you're not allowed to answer, but is it difficult to break the connection between the plugins and the dongle? I don't mean in an illegal crack way I mean as a company that has access to the source code. to get their things up to actual market needs )Įlicenser and Cubase are owned by Yamaha.don't get your hopes up unless they go into the human imbed chip. (still waiting bandlad to give that burst to next level, will be happy to help an any way by the way. I will def use it as a PT replacement and use S1 as my go to witch is the case since one year. at 179 euros the licences, risk is minimal, versus benefit if it rocks !! in all other areas it's pretty equals or superior to other daws. Ok don't tell me how i know that, and don't spread it, but chance are they're going dongless : when ? will it be done or not ? can't say but, thy're into it that's why i said don't laugth, it wasn't a joke lolĪnd i know their update process is expensive that's why i waited a version i could stick with for years, the only thing missing is the ability to have complex routing of complex fx / instuyments chains,reakltime Clip FX and an easy way to read overlapping audio clip events. Personnaly iv'e been testing here and there cubase for years, and this is why i bougth the Cubase 10 pro, this one is the first time it's solid in pretty every apsect including some aesthetics stuff.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |